If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Damn, would've thought the new blade would've managed to tip over the old GSXR :?
The gixx does well for a returning model u must admit. Wonder what a re-work would do. Though if its anything like the 600, you loose HP, but gain torque :twisted:
look at the load of whoop-ass in low-midrange it has over the others.
plus you get the factory racing kit with new gixxer thou: braid lines, yoshi cans. :twisted:
I believe that the GSX-R 1000 has a stroke a few mm longer and bore a few mm narrower than the other bikes, thus giving it a low-down torque advantage. The fact that it still makes awesome top-end horsepower is a credit to the Suzuki engine design team...
Also note that the brand of dyno used is not often used in Australia, where Dyno Dynamics units are more common (followed by the usually higher-reading Dyno Jet dynos).
I dont believe the figures spat out of a dyno are everything... there is so many different things that make a bike better than another bike... E.G. The hayabusa sure, it dynos great... but handles like a bus with square wheels.
I cant wait to actually sit and ride a few to test them out... lots of fun!
They all look impressive.
But what would cause the R1's torque to drop so dramatically between 6000 - 8500rpm?
It's done deliberately since they do the emissions tests (if I remember right) by taking where max power is made and halving it. So if your bike peaks out at 12,000rpm they do the emissions testing at 6,000rpm. Since the manufacturers know this, they program the bikes to have a flat spot around that rpm range so they can pass emissions at those rpm and just forget about it everywhere else 8)
That's what I remember reading up on anyhow. A good remap and it should take the dip right out.
Comment