I would have read it earlier, but "hotmail sux" as a thread title didn't really draw me in ^_^
This conundrum has been argued on online forums by physics nerds for a while now and I reckon it's been corrupted by people arguing the finer points of friction coefficients, tyre manufacture, ball bearings and 21st century treadmill design.
For my money, the plane won't take off, for the reason given by foolishboy. The plane wings must have enough velocity through the air to generate the requisite lift to overcome the weight of the plane.
If the wheels are spinning freely (or the plane is up on blocks in the hangar, or the pilot has absentmindedly left the handbrake on
) the plane doesn't generate the velocity - and hence the lift - needed to overcome its weight.
And I SUCK at physics.
This conundrum has been argued on online forums by physics nerds for a while now and I reckon it's been corrupted by people arguing the finer points of friction coefficients, tyre manufacture, ball bearings and 21st century treadmill design.

For my money, the plane won't take off, for the reason given by foolishboy. The plane wings must have enough velocity through the air to generate the requisite lift to overcome the weight of the plane.
If the wheels are spinning freely (or the plane is up on blocks in the hangar, or the pilot has absentmindedly left the handbrake on

And I SUCK at physics.
Comment